Menu
Kaksplus
VAUVAHAAVEET
Hedelmällisyys
Lapsettomuus
Adoptio
Ovulaatiolaskuri
RASKAUS
Raskaus viikko viikolta
Synnytys
Synnytystarinat
Raskauslaskuri
VAUVA
Imetys ja vauvan ruoka
Vauvan kehitys
Vauvan terveys
Nimikone
LAPSI
Lapsen kehitys
Lapsen terveys
Pituuslaskuri
PERHE-ELÄMÄ
Ruoka
Vaatteet ja varusteet
Koti
Vapaa-aika
Parisuhde
Työ ja raha
VANHEMMUUS
Kasvatus
Vanhemman terveys
Minun tarinani
LASKURIT
Ovulaatiolaskuri
Raskauslaskuri
Raskaus viikko viikolta
Kiinalainen syntymäkalenteri
Nimikone
Pituuslaskuri
PODCAST
KILPAILUT
BLOGIT
Menu
ETUSIVU
KESKUSTELUT
Aihe vapaa
Lapsen saaminen
Vauva ja taapero
Lapset ja teinit
Perhe-elämä
Seksi
Seksinovellit ja eroottiset tarinat
KÄYTTÄJÄT
OHJEITA
Kirjaudu
Rekisteröidy
Hae
Hae vain otsikoista
Käyttäjältä:
Hae vain otsikoista
Käyttäjältä:
Kaksplussan Keskustelupalsta
Kirjaudu
Kaksplus
VAUVAHAAVEET
Hedelmällisyys
Lapsettomuus
Adoptio
Ovulaatiolaskuri
RASKAUS
Raskaus viikko viikolta
Synnytys
Synnytystarinat
Raskauslaskuri
VAUVA
Imetys ja vauvan ruoka
Vauvan kehitys
Vauvan terveys
Nimikone
LAPSI
Lapsen kehitys
Lapsen terveys
Pituuslaskuri
PERHE-ELÄMÄ
Ruoka
Vaatteet ja varusteet
Koti
Vapaa-aika
Parisuhde
Työ ja raha
VANHEMMUUS
Kasvatus
Vanhemman terveys
Minun tarinani
LASKURIT
Ovulaatiolaskuri
Raskauslaskuri
Raskaus viikko viikolta
Kiinalainen syntymäkalenteri
Nimikone
Pituuslaskuri
PODCAST
KILPAILUT
BLOGIT
Aihe vapaa
Kenenkään lapsella/itsellä munuasvaivoja?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Vastaa viestiketjuun
Muistiinpanot
<p>[QUOTE="kidney = munuainen, post: 22577930"]</p><p>"By Rady Ananda</p><p></p><p>In what is being described as the first ever and most comprehensive study of the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers have linked organ damage with consumption of Monsantos GM maize.</p><p></p><p>Three varieties of Monsantos GM corn Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup® herbicide-absorbing NK 603 were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities. The data used for this approval, ironically, is the same data that independent researchers studied to make the organ damage link.</p><p></p><p>The Committee of Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) and Universities of Caen and Rouen obtained Monsantos confidential raw data of its 2002 feeding trials on rats after a European court made it public in 2005.</p><p></p><p>The data clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system, reported Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen.</p><p></p><p>Although different levels of adverse impact on vital organs were noticed between the three GMOs, the 2009 research shows specific effects associated with consumption of each, differentiated by sex and dose.</p><p></p><p>Their December 2009 study appears in the International Journal of Biological Sciences (IJBS). This latest study conforms with a 2007 analysis by CRIIGEN on Mon 863, published in Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, using the same data.</p><p></p><p>Monsanto rejected the 2007 conclusions, stating:</p><p></p><p>The analyses conducted by these authors are not consistent with what has been traditionally accepted for use by regulatory toxicologists for analysis of rat toxicology data.</p><p></p><p>[Also see Doull J, Gaylor D, Greim HA, et al. Report of an expert panel on the reanalysis by Séralini et al. (2007) of a 90-day study conducted by Monsanto in support of the safety of a genetically modified corn variety (MON 863). Food Chem Toxicol. 2007; 45:2073-2085.]</p><p></p><p>In an email to me, Séralini explained that their study goes beyond Monsantos analysis by exploring the sex-differentiated health effects on mammals, which Doull, et al. ignored:</p><p></p><p>Our study contradicts Monsanto conclusions because Monsanto systematically neglects significant health effects in mammals that are different in males and females eating GMOs, or not proportional to the dose. This is a very serious mistake, dramatic for public health. This is the major conclusion revealed by our work, the only careful reanalysis of Monsanto crude statistical data.</p><p></p><p>Other problems with Monsantos conclusions</p><p></p><p>When testing for drug or pesticide safety, the standard protocol uses three mammalian species. The subject studies only used rats, yet won GMO approval in more than a dozen nations.</p><p></p><p>Chronic problems are rarely discovered in 90 days; most often such tests run for up to two years. Tests lasting longer than three months give more chances to reveal metabolic, nervous, immune, hormonal or cancer diseases, wrote Seralini, et al. in their Doull rebuttal. [See How Subchronic and Chronic Health Effects can be Neglected for GMOs, Pesticides or Chemicals. IJBS; 2009; 5(5):438-443.]</p><p></p><p>Further, Monsantos analysis compared unrelated feeding groups, muddying the results. The June 2009 rebuttal explains, In order to isolate the effect of the GM transformation process from other variables, it is only valid to compare the GMO with its isogenic non-GM equivalent.</p><p></p><p>The researchers conclude that the raw data from all three GMO studies reveal novel pesticide residues will be present in food and feed and may pose grave health risks to those consuming them.</p><p></p><p>They have called for an immediate ban on the import and cultivation of these GMOs and strongly recommend additional long-term (up to two years) and multi-generational animal feeding studies on at least three species to provide true scientifically valid data on the acute and chronic toxic effects of GM crops, feed and foods.</p><p></p><p>Human health, of course, is of primary import to us, but ecological effects are also in play. Ninety-nine percent of GMO crops either tolerate or produce insecticide. This may be the reason we see bee colony collapse disorder and massive butterfly deaths. If GMOs are wiping out Earths pollinators, they are far more disastrous than the threat they pose to humans and other mammals.</p><p></p><p>Further Reading</p><p></p><p>Health Risks of GM Foods, Jeffrey M. Smith</p><p>Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops, Union of Concerned Scientists</p><p>Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years, The Organic Center"</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="kidney = munuainen, post: 22577930"] "By Rady Ananda In what is being described as the first ever and most comprehensive study of the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers have linked organ damage with consumption of Monsantos GM maize. Three varieties of Monsantos GM corn Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup® herbicide-absorbing NK 603 were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities. The data used for this approval, ironically, is the same data that independent researchers studied to make the organ damage link. The Committee of Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) and Universities of Caen and Rouen obtained Monsantos confidential raw data of its 2002 feeding trials on rats after a European court made it public in 2005. The data clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system, reported Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen. Although different levels of adverse impact on vital organs were noticed between the three GMOs, the 2009 research shows specific effects associated with consumption of each, differentiated by sex and dose. Their December 2009 study appears in the International Journal of Biological Sciences (IJBS). This latest study conforms with a 2007 analysis by CRIIGEN on Mon 863, published in Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, using the same data. Monsanto rejected the 2007 conclusions, stating: The analyses conducted by these authors are not consistent with what has been traditionally accepted for use by regulatory toxicologists for analysis of rat toxicology data. [Also see Doull J, Gaylor D, Greim HA, et al. Report of an expert panel on the reanalysis by Séralini et al. (2007) of a 90-day study conducted by Monsanto in support of the safety of a genetically modified corn variety (MON 863). Food Chem Toxicol. 2007; 45:2073-2085.] In an email to me, Séralini explained that their study goes beyond Monsantos analysis by exploring the sex-differentiated health effects on mammals, which Doull, et al. ignored: Our study contradicts Monsanto conclusions because Monsanto systematically neglects significant health effects in mammals that are different in males and females eating GMOs, or not proportional to the dose. This is a very serious mistake, dramatic for public health. This is the major conclusion revealed by our work, the only careful reanalysis of Monsanto crude statistical data. Other problems with Monsantos conclusions When testing for drug or pesticide safety, the standard protocol uses three mammalian species. The subject studies only used rats, yet won GMO approval in more than a dozen nations. Chronic problems are rarely discovered in 90 days; most often such tests run for up to two years. Tests lasting longer than three months give more chances to reveal metabolic, nervous, immune, hormonal or cancer diseases, wrote Seralini, et al. in their Doull rebuttal. [See How Subchronic and Chronic Health Effects can be Neglected for GMOs, Pesticides or Chemicals. IJBS; 2009; 5(5):438-443.] Further, Monsantos analysis compared unrelated feeding groups, muddying the results. The June 2009 rebuttal explains, In order to isolate the effect of the GM transformation process from other variables, it is only valid to compare the GMO with its isogenic non-GM equivalent. The researchers conclude that the raw data from all three GMO studies reveal novel pesticide residues will be present in food and feed and may pose grave health risks to those consuming them. They have called for an immediate ban on the import and cultivation of these GMOs and strongly recommend additional long-term (up to two years) and multi-generational animal feeding studies on at least three species to provide true scientifically valid data on the acute and chronic toxic effects of GM crops, feed and foods. Human health, of course, is of primary import to us, but ecological effects are also in play. Ninety-nine percent of GMO crops either tolerate or produce insecticide. This may be the reason we see bee colony collapse disorder and massive butterfly deaths. If GMOs are wiping out Earths pollinators, they are far more disastrous than the threat they pose to humans and other mammals. Further Reading Health Risks of GM Foods, Jeffrey M. Smith Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops, Union of Concerned Scientists Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years, The Organic Center" [/QUOTE]
Esikatsele
Nimimerkki
Varmistus
Kuinka monta sanaa on lauseessa: "Tupenrapinat"
Lähetä vastaus
Uusimmat
Luetuimmat
Kuumimmat
Uusimmat
Näytä kaikki
1.
Kertokaa Sigman pyörämittareista
29 min sitten
vierailija
0 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
2.
Auto number guard-car
51 min sitten
vierailija
0 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
3.
Miksi Hakkarainen erotettiin Perussuomalaisista?
Eilen 22:05
vierailija
1 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
4.
Haluatteko kuulla, kun joku puhuu viisaita EU:sta? Se ei ole Purra...
Eilen 21:41
vierailija
3 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
5.
Huomenna sunnuntaina aamupäivällä kello 11 valtiovarainministeri Riikka Purra (PS) puhuu viisaita
Eilen 20:56
vierailija
6 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
6.
Shokki lääkärillä
Eilen 18:50
vierailija
3 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
7.
Äänestä eurooppaan Suomalaisia, älä perussuomalaisia
Eilen 17:54
vierailija
7 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
8.
Väkivaltavideot vertailuun
Eilen 17:06
vierailija
2 Viestiä
Aihe vapaa
Luetuimmat
1.
Euroviisut on pilalla 😤 Siitä tuli outojen kummajaisten temmellyskenttä. Siellä voitti kummajainen. Kaikki toimittajat, ”ammattiraati” ja yleisöstä
Started by vierailija
12.05.2024
Luettu: 752
Aihe vapaa
2.
Selittäkää nyt kepulit ja punikit että miksi? ”MT:n kysely: Vornasen ampumatapaus saanut monet harkitsemaan perussuomalaisten äänestämistä.”
Started by vierailija
Maanantai klo 06:15
Luettu: 694
Aihe vapaa
3.
Joku oli jättänyt tallin nurkille tyhjän kondomipakan
Started by seimittlik
12.05.2024
Luettu: 552
Aihe vapaa
4.
"Tuoreet vaaliennusteet kertovat, että Euroopan parlamentti on siirtymässä kesäkuun vaaleissa monta askelta oikealle."
Started by vierailija
Tiistai klo 08:04
Luettu: 551
Aihe vapaa
5.
Mikä siinä on kun tytöt eivät kestä elämää vaan ahdistuvat?
Started by vierailija
Tiistai klo 19:02
Luettu: 535
Aihe vapaa
6.
Duunari; SDP, Vas, Vihr. vai joku muu?
Started by vierailija
12.05.2024
Luettu: 524
Aihe vapaa
7.
Helsingin Sanomat paljastaa miten väestönvaihto etenee Suomen kunnissa
Started by vierailija
12.05.2024
Luettu: 517
Aihe vapaa
8.
Kysytkö puolisolta lupaa esim. takin ostamiseen?
Started by vierailija
Maanantai klo 22:11
Luettu: 507
Aihe vapaa
Kuumimmat
Näytä kaikki
1.
Lähetä terveisesi kaipaamallesi ihmiselle yöketju
Latest: vierailija
1 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
2.
Perjantain tiskoteekki!
Latest: vierailija
5 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
3.
Aikamoinen puutarha
Latest: LadySLO:)
9 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
4.
Huomenna sunnuntaina aamupäivällä kello 11 valtiovarainministeri Riikka Purra (PS) puhuu viisaita
Latest: vierailija
9 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
5.
K/B-komposti
Latest: vierailija
13 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
6.
Voiko lasten äänistä saada häädön vuokra-asunnosta???
Latest: vierailija
16 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
7.
Kylmää kyytiä tiedossa elämäntapatyöttömille
Latest: vierailija
22 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
8.
Kertokaa Sigman pyörämittareista
Latest: vierailija
29 min sitten
Aihe vapaa
Yhteistyössä
Aihe vapaa
Kenenkään lapsella/itsellä munuasvaivoja?
Ylös
Bottom
+ Aloita uusi keskustelu